There have been a number of reviews of Triangle’s gaming strategy, but not many that cover all 3 aspects. This article covers the basics of their three different games while giving an overview on what they’re trying to achieve with them.
The “triangle strategy endings” is a game about the future. It has been made by the same developers that made the popular games “The Walking Dead”, “The Wolf Among Us”, and “Game of Thrones”.
I must choose between allying with the dominant trade nation and securing my country’s economic future and defending the persecuted minority who have been demonized and exploited by that same nation for years. My actions may have irrevocable consequences and may provoke a rift within my own political party, but there is no time to spare. So I do the only logical thing I can think of: I get out a set of scales, compel everyone to speak to me, and let them determine what should happen next.
The Scales of Conviction are how we resolve significant challenges in Triangle Strategy, and although they may seem ludicrous on the surface, they conceal a superbly planned tactics game with a surprisingly deep and well-executed plot.
Review of the Triangle Strategy: Triple Threat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nhTJ-Evv U
The continent of Norzelia, where Triangle Strategy takes place, is a tiny region ruled by three governing powers: Hyzante, the theocracy; Aesfrost, savage warmongers; and Glenbrook, looking peaceful on the surface but harboring deadly treacherous currents under the surface. Serenoa, the lord of House Wolffort, one of Glenbrook’s noble houses, is at the heart of the plot when Aesfrost invades his land and shatters decades of peace.
The premise and setup may seem to be normal RPG fare, but Triangle Strategy regularly astonished me with its twists and turns after its sluggish start. Triangle Strategy is, at its core, a dark, multidimensional story about tyranny, twisted morality, and, to a lesser degree, living with the repercussions of your actions.
Take, for example, an occurrence that occurred around halfway through. You find proof that a Hyzante minister is involved in illicit salt trade. Hyzante controls Norzelia’s sole supply of salt, resulting in significant trade imbalances, hatred, and a refusal by anybody to speak out against Hyzante’s abuse of ethnic minorities.
You have two options: expose the minister, which would put Serenoa in a position of power in Hyzante, or assist him in his crimes. There doesn’t seem to be any ethically proper route. Although the minister is violating the law, illicit salt frequently sells for a lesser price, making it more accessible to the ordinary person — and potentially lethal if a middleman mixes it with something less delicious.
Each important decision separates the main plot in at least one direction, yet all pathways converge in the end. Except for a late-game chapter, no option taken outside of the “real” path prevents you from getting a certain ending. It’s a well-thought-out design decision that provides much flexibility in how the tale progresses while also allowing you to explore all potential paths without being cumbersome.
Triangle Strategy combines high politics with fantasy with a moving cast of characters, however it’s a little more sophisticated here. Serenoa’s main supporters, including his Aesfrosti bride-to-be Frederica, are a motley crew thrown into the middle of a worldwide struggle.
They don’t discuss much about the bigger picture outside of the current events at hand, and you don’t learn much about them as individuals, but I was nevertheless drawn to the little group and its strained bond. To fill up the gaps, though, some creativity is necessary. Instead than being a character-driven tale, this is more of a case of characters having a part in the plot.
It works for the main cast, but the recruitable characters have an issue with it. These appear with a little backstory that introduces them and their objectives, and then you don’t hear from them again. They don’t appear in the exploring phases, can’t vote, and have no more side tales. It’s a pity. Triangle Strategy has an odd and lovable cast of characters, and it’s a shame they never have an opportunity to grow or even converse.
Voting, and the Convictions system around which it revolves, are much more intriguing than the scale arrangement suggests. What seems to be a nebulous feature that levels up at random is really subject to a complex system of criteria. You don’t see how the Convictions system works until your second playthrough, when instead of the typical pop-up indicating you reinforced your Convictions, you see the affiliation of each action and how many points it grants.
It’s a brilliant method of putting you in the protagonist’s shoes, motivating you to do acts you believe in without knowing what consequences they could have, and then you can min-max and manipulate the voting system next time if you want.
Voting and the Scales of Conviction seemed to be a gimmicky notion in both demos, and I still believe it stands out uncomfortably after playing the game. Without the ceremony, casting lots or even allowing everyone to vote vocally, like in Disgaea’s Dark Assembly, would have the same effect. Triangle Strategy, on the other hand, approaches these bits with such solemnity that it’s difficult not to be taken in, and the depth of the pre-vote discussions more than compensates for the mild absurdity.
Votes dictate the plot route you’ll pursue in specific chapters, and you may persuade others to agree with you if you use the appropriate method. However, “the proper method” is seldom something that comes to mind straight away. Speaking with others during exploratory segments opens up new discussion possibilities, but it’s more than simply leveraging hidden information to force everyone to agree with you.
Each member of House Wolffort is as adamant about their beliefs as you are, so you’ll need a persuasive argument to persuade them to alter their thoughts.
On the battlefield, Triangle Strategy is just as clever, albeit it pulls back a little too much. It’s more of a Divinity: Original Sin mix than a pure tactics game, with a strong focus on how elemental assaults effect the environment and individual soldiers. For example, freezing a square delays units and diminishes precision.
You may then use a fire attack to melt the ice before using a thunder strike to electrify the puddle. Alternatively, you may entice foes into a bottleneck, apply oil to the tiles, and set it on fire.
Positioning is also more critical than in other tactics games. As you’d imagine, attacks from behind cause greater damage, but it goes even farther. Most battles may be approached in a variety of ways, such as driving foes into danger zones, changing their placement using Wind spells, or chaining critical strikes based on how your soldiers are placed.
That’s simply dealing with the most important people. Each recruitable character has their own set of talents, which alters your fighting strategy more than you may imagine. The Sage ultimately learns each element’s power, allowing you to put your fire and ice mages to rest. One character possesses a healing area of effect talent, while another increases the effectiveness of your assault items, allowing you to avoid using magic entirely. It’s immensely deep and gratifying, and the many plot paths make it easy to create several distinct playthroughs.
The main issue is that it takes many chapters before these systems seem fully realized, due in part to the sluggish rate at which talents are unlocked. Early on, things are a little too simple, but things start to become more intriguing about chapter six, and then they get a lot more exciting from there. Some of Triangle Strategy’s mid- and late-game levels are absolutely fantastic, which makes me optimistic for a successor – maybe Hexagon Tactics?
Review of the Triangle Strategy: The Bottom Line
Pros
- This is a complex tale.
- A more in-depth tactical system.
- Character qualities that are exceptional.
- The stage is well designed.
- Alignment system with a twist.
- Choices that matter.
- [insert heart-eyes emoji] Those HD-2D graphics.
Cons
- The majority of characters aren’t given the opportunity to grow.
- It takes a long time for the systems to shine.
Triangle Strategy offers all three elements required for a successful tactics game: plot, systems, and style. Whatever flaws there are in the first half in terms of character development and pace, they’re easy to ignore. This is without a doubt one of the brightest and most intriguing tactics games to come out in recent years, and one that I’ll be playing for a long time.
[Note: The copy of Triangle Strategy utilized in this review was given by Nintendo of America.]The “triangle strategy release date” is a game that was released on November 2, 2018. It is a strategy game that can be played in single-player and multiplayer mode. The player controls units to destroy the enemy base.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you grind in Triangle Strategy?
A: I am unable to answer that question.
Is Triangle Strategy worth it?
A: When you first start Beat Saber, it is helpful to know what the different buttons do. The triangle button will not cut through blocks but instead create a solid block that can be used as a platform or obstacle in some situations. If you think this strategy may be useful for your particular situation then go ahead and use it! Otherwise, just move on to another mode of gameplay like Hyper Mode which has randomized level design so there are no learning curves
How long is Triangle Strategy?
A: Triangle Strategy is 1 minute and 57 seconds long.
Related Tags
- triangle strategy review ign
- triangle strategy review reddit
- triangle strategy recruitable characters
- triangle strategy aesfrost or hyzante
- triangle strategy wiki
